Skip to main content

Precise DNA cut!

We all know that we can cut and engineer our DNA or DNA of any other organism. But, so far the methods used for DNA cutting are not precise.

Available techniques:
By the older method, the genes are added into the cell and they get inserted into the genome of the cell in a random manner. This can’t be used when our aim is to engineer the DNA at a specific site and here we can’t also replace the already existing gene with our gene.

There is homologous recombination method, but unfortunately natural recombination won’t occur in cells that easily!

There are also methods which use Zinc fingers for delivering nucleases which cuts the DNA, but, this is really hard, because nuclease can’t target every possible DNA sequence. This is costly too.

TALENs – Transcription Activator Like Effector Nucleases – cut the DNA at specific location. But, what to do, this is also costly!

Our new method
Here, we are going to use the already  existing proteins of bacteria and  RNA. The tool contains RNA sequence with the nuclease called cas9.

Here, RNA is used for recognising the site on the genome where we have to make a cut and Cas9 for cutting! The Cas9 get activated once the RNA finds exact match. It won’t get activated, even if there is a single residue difference.

If we are willing to replace the already existing sequence with new one, we have to provide a DNA template.

This is not costly, yet effective and precise!

This is a good news for all Genetic Engineers, right? Even, I’m happy about this as a GE student, then for sure this is going to be a boon for Genetic Engineers.

After all, as my professor said, Playing with genes is the real fun! J

Comments

  1. Random browsing took me here :) Nice write-ups about various biotech related stuff, I could learn some new things.

    I am not a biotech guy, but, from what I know, I would like to post some details here. As a biotech student, you may be knowing it already.

    DNA can be precisely cut using Restriction Enzymes. For example, you have mentioned TALENs, which are artificial restriction enzymes. Restriction enzymes make a cut at a specific place on both the bases of a ds-DNA, thus making some engineering possible. Restriction enzymes are available naturally and as far as I know, are not very expensive.

    What you are discussing here seem to focus more about Genome editing with engineered nucleases, which generally are artificially engineered nucleases. I know nothing about these artificially engineered nucleases, but came to know something about it from your blog.

    Have a good day!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Actually this is not for performing invitro recombination like using enzymes like E.coR1 and ligases for cloning. This is for modifying the genome of humans or other mammals for knocking out genes which could cause diseases.

    The enzyme here mentioned is a natural one available in Bacteria - this enzyme is generally used by the bacteria for protecting itself from viral infections.

    Here we are using that enzyme in addition to that we are adding RNA sequence for recognising the sequences (where we have to make a cut).

    Hope you got it and I believe I understood the mechanism and explained it right!

    Thanks for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Kanmani: Thanks for the details. I got your point, actually, your first few lines of introduction to the topic saying that "methods available so far to cut DNA are not precise" made me write about restriction enzymes.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lowry Assay Principle and procedure

Though there are several protein assays available, the most preferred one in many laboratories is "Lowry assay". It is effective in the concentration range of 0.01 mg/ml to 1 mg/ml. And, as an additional info, the paper published describing the procedure and principle of Lowry Assay is the most cited paper in the scientific history. (Feeling like, "Wow! I want to publish one to compete with Oliver.H. Lowry"???  :P) Why Lowry?   Though there are several other protein assays, mostly Lowry assay is used in many laboratories. The reasons for preferring Lowry are: sensitivity of the assay, highly reproducible, cost effective, easy to perform. Biuret assay is generally used for higher protein concentrations like tissue samples but, Lowry for less concentrated samples and hence used in most of the molecular biology laboratories where there will be need for assaying comparatively less concentrated protein samples (in most cases where we attempt to produce enzymes). Oth...

Fire in the lab!!! BE CAREFUL!!!! A Lesson learnt!

   That day, we were working in our lab under laminar air flow chamber. we were streaking our plates with E.coli. For sterilizing the loop, we were using 70% ethanol. We also sterilized the L rod which we used for spreading , using the same Ethanol.  One by one, we started streaking and spreading. I completed my turn, and sterilized the L rod by dipping in ethanol once and shown in flame, and placed it in a tray.Mam instructed, " Ethanol will catch fire , if you place the hot rod over it" . One of my friend, did spreading after my turn, she too dipped the rod in ethanol, flamed the rod and instead of placing in the tray she misplaced the hot rod in the ethanol plate!!!! " oooo... fire fire..." immediately ethanol caught fire..!!! My friend who misplaced., she started crying... Mam shouted, " hey girls, guys run out of the lab...," as the tube which carries LPG for the flame was very close to fire. Suddenly, our lab technician acte...

Agarose gel Electrophoresis with principle

Hi, Agarose gel electrophoresis In the previous post I explained how to quantify DNA, and now we can find the molecular weight of that extracted DNA. But, how? Simple, you need to run an agarose gel! Preparation of agarose gel: Agarose gel must be prepared based on the DNA we are going to run. For example: if you are going to run Genomic DNA, you must use 0.6%gel, for plasmid DNA, you must use 0.8% gel, for PCR(Polymerase chain reaction) sample, you must use 1.2% gel. You may ask, why three different % of gels? The answer for your question is: Genomic DNA will be bulkier than pDNA - so, we must use a gel with less percentage, so that the pore size will be greater and the genomic DNA can move easily. In case of PCR sample, the gene amplified won't be bulky, so, it moves fast, very fast in low percent gel, that's why to have an optimum speed we use a higher percentage of gel comparatively. And, when our aim is to separate two sequences with relatively equal size...